Am 12.10.2013 22:30, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > On 2013年10月12日 22:25:36 +0200 > Georg Brandl <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > ("limited API" is really a bad synonym for "stable ABI" IMO) >> >> >> >> It's not a synonym: to get a stable ABI, you use the limited API. >> > >> > I still don't like that name, because it doesn't convey any interesting >> > information. "Stable ABI" is immediately informative. >> >> It can be changed, but we document the C API, not an ABI. > > This is a rather mistaken statement. The only point of using the > "limited API" is because it provides the stable ABI. There is *zero* > other reason of caring about it.
Well, I tried to follow PEP 384 wording. Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com