13.09.13 23:21, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла):
Both. On one side, with this proposition TransformDict itself doesn't deserve PEP. It will be trivial and obvious thing. Not very important. On other side, TransformDict can be implemented even without dict.__transform__(), on pure Python.On 2013年9月13日 23:16:10 +0300 Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]> wrote:13.09.13 21:40, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла):Alternative proposals and questions ===================================Yet one alternative proposal is to add the dict.__transform__() method. Actually this not contradict TransformDict, but generalize it. TransformDict will be just handly interface to __transform__() as defaultdict to __missing__(). It provides only constructor, repr and pickling.Is it an alternative proposal or is it compatible with the PEP? The PEP specifies the API, not the implementation.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com