Re: [Python-Dev] PLY in stdlib (was cffi in stdlib)

2013年7月12日 21:59:58 -0700

David Beasley; see earlier in this same thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-February/thread.html#124389 
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Terry Reedy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/13/2013 12:10 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2013 4:31 AM, "Michael Foord" <[email protected]
>>
>
> > +1 PLY is capable and well tried-and-tested. We used it in Resolver
>> One to implement a pretty large grammar and it is (in my opinion) best
>> of breed in the Python parser generator world. Being stable and widely
>> used, with an "available maintainer", makes it an ideal candidate for
>> standard library inclusion.
>>
>> Is this still on the table?
>>
>
> Who is the maintainer and what is his opinion?
>
> --
> Terry Jan Reedy
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-dev<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev>
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/**mailman/options/python-dev/**
> jdunck%40gmail.com<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jdunck%40gmail.com>
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to