On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2013年3月30日 08:33:38 +0200 > Simon Cross <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to >> alternative Python implementations. > > Why?
I don't think it's worth discussing - tkinter does not work on any other implementation than CPython and it seems it won't work. It's a bit pity, but I guess if I felt really bad about it, I should just make it work. PS. are there idle projects in SoC? Maybe we should put a more pypy-friendly one there too? Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com