Eli Bendersky <[email protected]> wrote: > For anyone who isn't following the issue: A PEP proposing a different DSL > will be forthcoming either this or next weekend. > > > If the two proposals share at least the motivation, would it not be more > constructive to just have them listed as alternatives in a single PEP? This > could serve as a useful single source of information for the new proposed > features.
I find PEPs that propose multiple alternatives hard to read. My PEP won't be short: It will contain a token specifications, a yacc grammar and an attempt to specify the semantics of the DSL. Stefan Krah _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com