Re: [Python-Dev] an alternative to embedding policy in PEP 418 (was: PEP 418: Add monotonic clock)

2012年4月05日 15:07:55 -0700

On 05Apr2012 03:05, Oleg Broytman <[email protected]> wrote:
| On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:52:00PM -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
| > Forced? I do not use Python to be forced to use one style of
| > programming over another.
| 
| Then it's strange you are using Python with its strict syntax
| (case-sensitivity, forced indents), ubiquitous exceptions, limited
| syntax of lambdas and absence of code blocks (read - forced functions),
| etc.
But exceptions are NOT ubiquitous, nor should they be. They're a very
popular and often apt way to handle certain circumstances, that's all.
-- 
Cameron Simpson <[email protected]> DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
On the one hand I knew that programs could have a compelling and deep logical
beauty, on the other hand I was forced to admit that most programs are
presented in a way fit for mechanical execution, but even if of any beauty at
all, totally unfit for human appreciation. - Edsger W. Dijkstra
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to