<martin <at> v.loewis.de> writes: > Now that we do have the PEP, I think that should be done properly. > I thought you offered to rewrite it. Formally, I could accept the > PEP being withdrawn, and the feature integrated anyway, but I still > consider that bad style. > > So: I can offer to rewrite the PEP to give a full specification > of the feature. It might be that I still need some help to > provide end-user prose in the PEP if people would want to see that as > well.
+1 to both your and Brian's input. I will aim to keep the implementation in sync with any changes required as a result of resolving open issues. Regards, Vinay Sajip _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com