> It would be nice to call it something else than "printf-style > formatting". While it is certainly modelled on printf(), knowledge of C > or printf is not required to understand %-style formatting, nor even to > appreciate it. >
+1. The section is already titled "old string formatting operations" so if this name is acceptable it should be reused. If it's not, it should then be consistently changed everywhere. Eli
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com