M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > The results were produced by pybench 2.0 and use time.time > on Linux, plus a different calibration strategy. As a result > these timings are a lot more repeatable than with pybench 1.3 > and I've confirmed the timings using several runs to make sure.
can you check in 2.0 ? (if it's not quite ready for public consumption, put it in the sandbox). </F> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com