I don't remember this topic ever being discussed, but still I wouldn't expect that __something to be mangled, given that it refers to an attribute of an instance of D.
I might expect that in a "case D(something=__y)" you get the mangling for __y, but I'm not sure what the implementation does now and I'm writing from my phone On 2022年6月15日, 20:12 , <[email protected]> wrote: > For this code: > > class C: > def f(self, x): > match x: > case D(__something=y): > return y > > It appears that the name "__something" isn't mangled. Under most other > circumstances I'd expect this to be mangled to "_C__something". Is this: > * intentional, > * accidental, but how that it's done it's the defined behaviour, > * or a defect? > > It doesn't seem like it's explicitly tested for in test_patma.py either > way. > > Thanks > David > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LILLO3MBTVY6ZQT3VNUVXATEPS3ASGQF/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/335CR2QTKIP6DLVDCIEAGRKKQW6EU6WK/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/