On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:01 AM Christian Heimes <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/03/2022 21.41, Brett Cannon wrote: > > Therefore I propose that we target the oldest manylinux standard > > accepted by PyPI, for which the operating system has not reached its > > EOL. At the moment this is manylinux2014, aka CentOS 2024 with EOL > June > > 2024. We could also state that we aim for compatibility with oldest > > Debian Stable and Ubuntu LTS with standard, free security updates. > > As of > > today Debian 10 Buster Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic are the oldest versions > with > > regular updates. > > > > > > So does that mean you want to list the Linux distros explicitly? Or you > > want to explicitly list the glibc version? > > I want to explicitly mention glibc and Linux distro for manylinux binary > wheels standards that are supported by PyPI. For the rest we should be a > bit more hand-wavy. Maybe we can point to our list of stable buildbots? > How about we list Linux support as based on the libc implementation and version and point as various stable buildbots that cover that libc? > > > > > We should say something about compilers. I wouldn't list compiler > > versions, though. Compiler features like C99 support should be > > sufficient. > > > > > > Then what more would you want than what's listed in PEP 7 already? > > Nothing in particular other than a link to the PEP, so people can > discover the requirement more easily. > π
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/OEN667JU2ATPU75XPOBZAAU4BS72IXCH/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/