[Python-Dev] Re: "immortal" objects and how they would help per-interpreter GIL

2021年12月15日 09:19:20 -0800

All singletons do, AFAIK. And most static types that I can think of also
do, even the empty tuple.
On 2021年12月15日 at 16:49, Eric Snow <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:50 AM Pablo Galindo Salgado
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > One thing to consider: ideally, inmortal objects should not participate
> in the GC. There is nothing inheritly wrong if they do but we would need to
> update the GC (and therefore add more branching in possible hot paths) to
> deal with these as the algorithm requires the refcount to be exact to
> correctly compute the cycles.
>
> That's a good point. Do static types and the global singletons
> already opt out of GC participation?
>
> -eric
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/3EAUAU5PF5YEHW4XXAVQGSLF4QEFCMJ6/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to