On 11/29/21 7:10 PM, Inada Naoki wrote:
Anyone against making a statement that "PEP 563 will never be the default behavior"?
I think only the SC is empowered to make such a statement.
I doubt the current status quo--keeping PEP 563 as optional behavior, permanently--is viable long-term. It causes problems for most runtime uses of annotations, which we were collectively basically ignoring until now. As runtime use of annotations /and/ typing both become more pervasive, these problems are only going to grow.Then, we do not need to decide "PEP 563 or 649". We can focus on whether we can replace "stock semantics + opt-in PEP 563" with PEP 649 or not.
//arry/
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/JHOJWKZZWW4TB6TS7GX26WERKAEAC7VH/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/