> On 4 Apr 2021, at 11:34, Matthias Klose <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 4/4/21 4:44 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: >> >> Unless the mistake was just introduced, the mistake would have happened. One >> this severe would likely have been caught within the week or two before a >> final. But as Łukasz noted when announcing the change, .rcs are generally >> ignored. > > Well, that's not true. I think for at least the past 3.8 and current 3.9 > cycle > I always tested the release candidates, and built them for various Linux > architectures. And I'm filing issues marked as 'released-blocker' when I see > regressions introduced, it's up to the release managers to determine if such > changes are intended or not.
Can you show us an example of a release-blocker issue you reported? - Ł
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/UOSUV632CJXZE3GCUPC6CWVBGS4KNEZY/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/