How a standard by ANSI, ECMA and/or ISO is any better than a standard by the PSF?
Is PSF bad at "controlling its growth and avoiding featuritis" in your opinion or smth? On 12.02.2021 21:33, Dan Stromberg wrote:
What would it take to create an ANSI, ECMA and/or ISO standard for Python? It seems to have really helped C.It looks like Java isn't standardized, and it's done OK, though perhaps it was healthier in the past - before Oracle decided API's were ownable.I think standardizing Python might be really good for controlling its growth and avoiding featuritis. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/JZYW4JOTANYIOLYDQ6YHRUP2TWO52OAE/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-- Regards, Ivan
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZBKXMHWFEIWGP7FZJDZPNPV7TEXANMIV/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/