On 2021年1月27日 11:05:28 +1100 Steven D'Aprano <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:08:03PM -0800, Brett Cannon wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:26 AM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...] > > > Disagreed. This is niche enough that it warrants a long but explicit > > > name, rather than some ambiguous shortcut. > > > > > > > I agree w/ Antoine that a more descriptive name for such a niche (but > > useful!) attribute makes sense. > > This descriptive name is *literally incorrect*. By design, it doesn't > list modules. It only lists sub-packages and not sub-modules, to keep > the number of entries more managable. > > (Personally, I don't think an extra hundred or two names makes that much > difference. Its going to be a big list one way or the other.) > > So by the current rules, many stdlib modules are not included and the > name is inaccurate.
Ok, then "stdlib_package_names"? :-) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/NMDFLQDCXRQNUBMHTHTH37OMDPCCQYRZ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/