On 2021年1月10日, 12:54 am Nick Coghlan, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 2021年1月10日, 12:22 am Paul Moore, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 13:53, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> The dictionary destructuring can act as an example. We know Nick's >> position: >> >> case {"text": message, "color": c}: >> >> 1. There's nothing (other than the fact that it's in a case clause) to >> indicate that message and c are assigned to. >> 2. It "binds to the right without using as", (as far as I can see, >> based on the premise that "as" is the only valid way of binding names >> where the name is on the right, which was asserted without any >> justification). >> > > What other syntax do we have that binds to the right without "as"? > Allowing it at all is only as old as with statements, but that's still more > precedence than ":" and "=" have for being used that way. > Correcting myself: the import statement usage has been around much longer than that. With statements were just the case that took 'as name' from being an import specific syntax to being a bit more general than that. Cheers, Nick. >>
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/CSW5HIN3WBEXYECBFZ7ZRH4KLXODLZTD/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/