On 2020年8月28日 10:20:08 +0200 Victor Stinner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > IMO a new PEP would avoid confusion: > > * The new PEP should list differences with the previously rejected PEP > * The old PEP remains available unchanged to help to understand why it > has been rejected > > It's common to have multiple PEP for the same feature. Once a PEP is > accepted, other PEP are rejected or marked as "superseded" (by the > accepted PEP).
Agreed with Victor. Please create a new PEP. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/SK5Q76F3GZAF6BAEMCSYDVX35YINZSAW/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/