Re: [Python-Dev] Should I postpone PEP 558 (locals() semantics) to Python 3.9?

2019年5月31日 09:45:56 -0700

On 5/31/2019 6:20 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri., 31 May 2019, 6:34 pm Nathaniel Smith, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
 I wouldn't mind having a little more breathing room. It's frustrating
 to miss the train, but these bugs are several decades old so I guess
 nothing terrible will happen if their fixes get delayed to 3.9.
Agreed.
And I could put that extra time to good use, as starting to flesh out the proxy implementation showed that we're missing a lot of scaffolding to help make it easier to define new low level mapping types without duplicating a lot of code.
I'll update the PEP headers accordingly.
I believe some of your suggested doc change is true now, will remain true, and improves on the current locals entry. No PEP approval is needed for this much.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to