On 2019年02月19日 04:04, Steve Dower wrote:
On 18Feb.2019 1324, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
For a very concrete example, was it really necessary to put
_PyTuple_ITEMS in (4)? That's used in _functoolsmodule.c. Especially
given that the very similar PySequence_Fast_ITEMS is in (2), that seems
like a strange and arbitrary limiting choice.
The reason to do this is that we can "guarantee" that we've fixed all
users when we change the internal representation.
I think that CPython should then at least "eat its own dog food" and
don't use any of the internal functions/macros when implementing the
stdlib. As I said before: if a function/macro is useful for implementing
stdlib functionality like "functools" or "json", it's probably useful
for external modules too.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com