On Sep 25, 2018, at 12:09, Yury Selivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > > My main concern with maintaining a *separate* documentation of > internals is that it would make it harder to keep it in sync with the > actual implementation. We often struggle to keep the comments in the > code in sync with that code.
Well, my goal is that the internal API would show up when I search for function names on docs.python.org. Right now, I believe the "quick search" box does search the entire documentation suite. I don’t care too much whether they would reside in a separate section in the current C API, or in a separate directory, listed or not under "Parts of the documentation" on the front landing page. But I agree they shouldn’t be intermingled with the public C API. Cheers, -Barry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com