Re: [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)

2018年6月26日 00:44:14 -0700

On 26.06.2018 0:13, Steve Holden wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Terry Reedy <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
 On 6/24/2018 7:25 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
 I'd wager that the people who might be most horrified about it
 the (b) scoping rule change
 would be people who feel strongly that the change to the
 comprehension scope rules in Python 3 is a big improvement,
 I might not be one of those 'most horrified' by (b), but I
 increasingly don't like it, and I was at best -0 on the
 comprehension scope change. To me, iteration variable assignment
 in the current scope is a non-problem. So to me the change was
 mostly useless churn. Little benefit, little harm. And not worth
 fighting when others saw a benefit.
 However, having made the change to nested scopes, I think we
 should stick with them. Or repeal them. (I believe there is
 another way to isolate iteration names -- see below). To me, (b)
 amounts to half repealing the nested scope change, making
 comprehensions half-fowl, half-fish chimeras.
​[...]​
-- Terry Jan Reedy
​I'd like to ask: how many readers of ​
​this email have ever deliberately taken advantage of the limited Python 3 scope in comprehensions and generator expressions to use what would otherwise be a conflicting local variable name?​
I did:
for l in (l.rstrip() for l in f):
The provisional unstripped line variable is totally unneeded in the following code.
I appreciate that the scope limitation can sidestep accidental naming errors, which is a good thing. Unfortunately, unless we anticipate Python 4 (or whatever) also making for loops have an implicit scope, I am left wondering whether it's not too large a price to pay. After all, special cases aren't special enough to break the rules, and unless the language is headed towards implicit scope for all uses of "for" one could argue that the scope limitation is a special case too far. It certainly threatens to be yet another confusion for learners, and while that isn't the only consideration, it should be given due weight.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/vano%40mail.mipt.ru
--
Regards,
Ivan
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to