On 02.06.18 05:47, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 2 June 2018 at 03:45, Jeroen Demeyer <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 2018年06月01日 17:18, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > Unfortunately, very few people use the stable ABI currently, so it's > easy for things like this to get missed. > > > So there are no tests for the stable ABI in Python? > > > Unfortunately not. > > https://bugs.python.org/issue21142 is an old issue suggesting automating > those checks (so we don't inadvertently add or remove symbols for > previously published stable ABI definitions), but it's not yet made it > to the state of being sufficiently well automated that it can be a > release checklist item in PEP 101. > > Cheers, > Nick.
Actually, I think we don't need such a test any more, or we could use this one as a heuristic test: I have written a script that scans all relevant header files and analyses all sections which are reachable in the limited API context. All macros that don't begin with an underscore which contain a "->tp_" string are the locations which will break. I found exactly 7 locations where this is the case. My PR will contain the 7 fixes plus the analysis script to go into tools. Preparind that in the evening. cheers -- Chris -- Christian Tismer-Sperling :^) [email protected] Software Consulting : http://www.stackless.com/ Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : http://pyside.org 14482 Potsdam : GPG key -> 0xFB7BEE0E phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com