On 5/22/2018 8:37 AM, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
A new issue was not needed. Adding 'bpo-33531' would have been fine, automatically linking the issue and the PR in both directions.Sorry for that.I thought that the bpo issue can be skipped because it is tests-only change, no asyncio code was affected.Will be more accurate next time.
-- Terry Jan Reedy _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com