On 26 April 2018 at 04:46, Jeroen Demeyer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2018年04月25日 20:33, Petr Viktorin wrote: >> >> Perhaps "m_objclass" could point to the module in this case > > > That was exactly my idea also today. Instead of treating m_objclass as the > defining class, we should generalize it to be the "parent" of the function: > either the class or the module.
PEP 487 refers to this as the "owner" of a descriptor (See the "__set_name__" example implementation in https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0487/#trait-descriptors ). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com