On 2018年04月21日, 07:46 GMT, Chris Angelico wrote: > doubled_items = [x for x in (items := get_items()) if x * 2 in > items]
Aside from other concerns expressed elsewhere by other people, do you really like this? I know and agree that "readability" is a subjective term, but it is my firm persuasion that whenever I need to think about what particular list comprehension means, it is the moment I should write a separate function or normal cycle. I think we should encourage writing simple (I didn’t use the r* word here, you see!) code than something which has potential to slide us towards Perl. Best, Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: [email protected] GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 A day without sunshine is like night. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com