www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from July to September 2008 by date

Monday, 29 September 2008

[Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5948] Reference to Unicode Database bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Friday, 26 September 2008

[Bug 6120] New: Reconsider blockDefault=#all bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5928] Content model for xs:schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5075] use of "ad" as an ID vs. ad blockers bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 4940] Explanation of terminology change regarding ur-type definition is a bit confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Thursday, 25 September 2008

[Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: OWL WG comments on XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Wednesday, 24 September 2008

[Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6048] Clarify which types the implementation limits apply to bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: OWL WG comments on XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
[Bug 6045] Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 23 September 2008

[Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Typo in current XSDCD WD? Mary Holstege
Typo in current XSDCD WD? Florent Georges

Monday, 22 September 2008

Fw: request for document review: XSD 1.1 by the SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Mark Phillips
[Bug 5732] Provide a simplified syntax for XSD 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Saturday, 20 September 2008

[Bug 5732] Provide a simplified syntax for XSD 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Friday, 19 September 2008

[Bug 5732] Provide a simplified syntax for XSD 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Thursday, 18 September 2008

[Bug 6056] Make identity constraints propagate through substitution groups? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6056] Make identity constraints propagate through substitution groups? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 17 September 2008

[Bug 5947] Support for XML 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 16 September 2008

[Bug 5046] <xsd:attributeGroup example 2 is incorrect bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6089] Revise anyURI to use RFCs 3986 and 3987 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6089] New: Revise anyURI to use RFCs 3986 and 3987 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Friday, 12 September 2008

[Bug 6021] Stylesheet for xs:override bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6045] Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6031] Oops! in algorithm of precisionDecimalCanonicalMap bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6056] New: Make identity constraints propagate through substitution groups? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Thursday, 11 September 2008

[Bug 6015] [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6014] [schema11] normative text problems bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6013] [schema11] new examples needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6012] [schema11] inconsistencies in text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6011] [schema11] base URI comments bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6009] [schema11] unclear passages bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 10 September 2008

[Bug 5949] Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 1 September 2008

W3C XSD V1.1 schema and OASIS CAM templates comment. David RR Webber \(XML\)

Tuesday, 9 September 2008

[Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5934] Typo concerning <simpleContent mixed="true"> bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5930] defaultOpenContent in the S4SD bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5904] Unknown attributes in vc namespace bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5949] Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 4642] Terminology: zone offset versus time zone bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5861] Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6048] Clarify which times the implementation limits apply to bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6047] Minimum implementation limit for decimal requires infinite precision - did you mean that? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6045] Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: OWL WG comments on XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
[Bug 6048] New: Clarify which times the implementation limits apply to bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6047] New: Minimum implementation limit for decimal requires infinite precision - did you mean that? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6046] New: Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6045] New: Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6044] New: Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6043] New: Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5861] Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5861] Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 8 September 2008

[Bug 6014] [schema11] normative text problems bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6012] [schema11] inconsistencies in text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Saturday, 6 September 2008

[Bug 6031] New: Oops! in algorithm of precisionDecimalCanonicalMap bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 3248] Numeric precision bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Friday, 5 September 2008

[Bug 3248] Numeric precision bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5947] Support for XML 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5948] Reference to Unicode Database bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
OWL WG comments on XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 3 September 2008

[Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6021] Stylesheet for xs:override bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6021] Stylesheet for xs:override bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 2 September 2008

[Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6021] New: Stylesheet for xs:override bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6015] New: [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6014] New: [schema11] normative text problems bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6013] New: [schema11] new examples needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6012] New: [schema11] inconsistencies in text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6011] New: [schema11] base URI comments bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6010] New: [schema11] priority feedback responses bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6009] New: [schema11] unclear passages bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6008] New: [schema11] small presumably editorial bugs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 4908] 'The schema corresponding to a schema document' and QName resolution bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Friday, 29 August 2008

[Bug 5930] defaultOpenContent in the S4SD bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 26 August 2008

[Bug 5940] Element Declarations Consistent bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 18 August 2008

[Bug 5949] Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5940] Element Declarations Consistent bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5934] Typo concerning <simpleContent mixed="true"> bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5930] defaultOpenContent and override in the S4SD bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 11 August 2008

[Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5950] New: References update bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5949] New: Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5948] New: Reference to Unicode Database bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5947] New: Support for XML 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Friday, 8 August 2008

[Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5904] Unknown attributes in vc namespace bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 3079] RFC3066 ref bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Thursday, 7 August 2008

[Bug 5943] New: ComplexContent extending SimpleContent bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5940] Element Declarations Consistent bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5940] New: Element Declarations Consistent bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5938] New: Spurious diff markup in 3.10.6.2 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 6 August 2008

[Bug 5934] New: Typo concerning <simpleContent mixed="true"> bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5932] Open content with empty content models bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5932] New: Open content with empty content models bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 5 August 2008

Re: [Bug 5862] Please retain redefine as well as override C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
[Bug 5931] Is xs:openContent/xs:any optional? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5931] New: Is xs:openContent/xs:any optional? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5930] New: defaultOpenContent in the S4SD bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5929] New: Facets in the schema for schema documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5928] New: Content model for xs:schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 4 August 2008

[Bug 5875] longName for elements, attributes and model groups bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: [Bug 5862] Please retain redefine as well as override noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
[Bug 5875] longName for elements, attributes and model groups bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5880] internationalization of tag names bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5862] Please retain redefine as well as override bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 30 July 2008

[Bug 5918] New: Top level declarations bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5917] New: Typo in 3.1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5916] New: Obsolete editorial note bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 29 July 2008

[Bug 5906] Problem in definition of <restriction> in <complexType>::<simpleContent> bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5907] New: Problem with BNF for type alternatives bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5905] New: vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5906] New: Problem in definition of <restriction> in <complexType>::<simpleContent> bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5904] New: Unknown attributes in vc namespace bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 4887] Broken link to IEEE 754-1985 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 21 July 2008

itemType case error in XML Schema for Schema 1.0 Satterfield, William J CTR USAF HQ AF GCIC/RINIV

Thursday, 24 July 2008

[Bug 5896] New: Description of particles and terms in 2.2.3.2 confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 23 July 2008

Re: Include earlier informal description of annotated component C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Description of particles and terms in 2.2.3.2 confusing C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Description of particles and terms in 2.2.3.2 confusing Pete Cordell
Include earlier informal description of annotated component Pete Cordell

Monday, 21 July 2008

[XSCD] any implementations of XML Schema: Component Designators? Mark Hansen

Wednesday, 16 July 2008

XML Schema Part 0: Primer Second Edition - Errata Corrige Sergio de Gioia

Friday, 18 July 2008

[Bug 5818] Unicode Database: shifting sands bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5880] New: internationalization of tag names bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5779] QName resolution and xs:import bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5800] Possibly revise list of required infoset properties bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5782] Definition of simpleType.{final} bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 4450] indistinguishable annotations? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5878] need errata documents against 1.0 2E bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5877] need errata documents against 1.0 2E bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5878] New: need errata documents against 1.0 2E bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5877] New: need errata documents against 1.0 2E bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5875] New: longName for elements, attributes and model groups bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 15 July 2008

[Bug 5372] Define bridge functions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 3678] [SCD] SCDs for attribute uses and particles bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 2659] lc-2: simple barenames for schema component designators bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 3046] RQ-23 First class objects (first-class-obj) bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 3855] Use of "Default Axis" versus XPath bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 3680] [SCD] Path abbreviations confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5373] [SCD] Define accessors bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 2661] lc-4: LC comments bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 4449] How do you write an empty namespace prefix? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5375] [SCD] Regularize the grammar bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5376] [SCD] Richer extension story bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 3684] [SCD] // confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5377] Requirement for metadata querying bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5371] [SCD] Eliminate notion of 'elided steps' bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 3685] [SCD] (Editorial) Origanize by axes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
3.2.17 of Part 2 and RFCs 3986/3987 MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

Sunday, 13 July 2008

[Bug 5862] New: Please retain redefine as well as override bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 5861] New: Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 9 July 2008

Tuesday, 8 July 2008

RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Michael Kay

Monday, 7 July 2008

Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Paul \

Tuesday, 8 July 2008

RE: markup editorial: <div class="p"> Michael Kay
Re: markup editorial: <div class="p"> Elliotte Harold
Re: markup editorial: <div class="p"> C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Richard H. McCullough
Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Dave Peterson

Monday, 7 July 2008

Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Richard H. McCullough
Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Dave Peterson
markup editorial: <div class="p"> Elliotte Harold

Sunday, 6 July 2008

Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Richard H. McCullough
RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Dave Peterson
RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Michael Kay
RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Dave Peterson

Saturday, 5 July 2008

RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Michael Kay
Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Alan Ruttenberg
Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Dave Peterson
Re: Question about number types Dave Peterson

Friday, 4 July 2008

Re: Question about number types Bijan Parsia
Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Question about number types Dave Peterson
Re: Question about number types C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Question about number types Bijan Parsia
Re: Question about number types C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Question about number types C.M.Sperberg-McQueen
RE: Question about number types Michael Kay
Re: Question about number types Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Question about number types C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Question about number types Dave Peterson

Thursday, 3 July 2008

RE: Question about number types Michael Kay
Re: Question about number types Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Question about number types Alan Ruttenberg

Wednesday, 2 July 2008

Re: Question about number types Dave Peterson
RE: Question about number types Michael Kay
Question about number types Alan Ruttenberg

Last message date: Monday, 29 September 2008 15:12:32 UTC