- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: 2006年5月02日 06:27:22 +0100
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4456EDBA.7080406@ninebynine.org>
Dan Brickley wrote: > * Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> [2006年05月01日 11:32-0400] >> Just to clarify things, I don't think there are "RDF specs" and "RDF >> syntax" affected other than RDF/XML are there? > > RDF/XML yup, perhaps GRDDL, RDF/A might touch on this too; but I was also > thinking about any future alternate XML encodings. Not that I'm yet > convinced this is needed; I just wanted to make sure the point was noted > on the appropriate list. It seems to me that this is a consequence of the "open tag set" problem of RDF/XML. Other XML encodings that use a fixed tag set for RDF "syntax" wouldn't have the problem of distinguishing between RDF vocabulary and other annotations. #g -- Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2006 05:28:11 UTC