- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:11:21 +0100
- To: Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20050406101121.2960ea4f@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
On 2005年4月06日 09:11:08 +0200, Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz> wrote: > Dan Brickley wrote: > > * Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> [2005年04月05日 13:50-0400] > > > >>>http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/process.html#rec-modify > > > > > > FWIW I've added a link to that, and to www-rdf-comments, to the errata page, > > also noting that the WG has closed. > > Dan, > > Could you also add an additional note about a likely error in the RELAX > NG grammar (section A.1)? The literalPropertyElt production in this > grammar reads: > > literalPropertyElt = > element * - ( local:* | rdf:RDF | rdf:ID | rdf:about | rdf:parseType | > rdf:resource | rdf:nodeID | rdf:datatype | > rdf:Description | rdf:aboutEach | rdf:aboutEachPrefix | > rdf:bagID | xml:* ) { > (idAttr | datatypeAttr )?, xmllang?, xmlbase?, text > } > > This production only allows either an rdf:ID attribute or an > rdf:datatype attribute to be specified, but not both. This is different > from the normative grammar in chapter 7. The result of following this > grammar would be that triples with a datatyped literal as object cannot > be reified in the normal way. Uhoh. > The corrected production reads: > > literalPropertyElt = > element * - ( local:* | rdf:RDF | rdf:ID | rdf:about | rdf:parseType | > rdf:resource | rdf:nodeID | rdf:datatype | > rdf:Description | rdf:aboutEach | rdf:aboutEachPrefix | > rdf:bagID | xml:* ) { > idAttr?, datatypeAttr?, xmllang?, xmlbase?, text > } > > Any editors or former WG-members that can acknowledge this error too? Well, IMHO using reification at all is a modelling error :) However your final correction looks ok to me to make the RELAXNG match the normative grammar for literalPropertyElt. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 09:13:14 UTC