- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 2003年8月14日 08:54:48 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: jjc@hpl.hp.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org, phayes@ihmc.us
- Message-ID: <3F3B4048.5070403@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
> > Well, I certainly didn't read ``correspond'' as ``directly 1-1 encode octet > sequences that are''. I read ``correspond'' as ``canonicalizes to'', or > some similar phrase. I don't see ``1-1'' in the 28 July draft at all. > In another thread, on RDF Core/I18N, we are talking about the word correspond in the defn of the lexical space. I suggested the following bullet point: [A set of Unicode strings which] [[ + correspond under [UTF-8] encoding to exclusive Canonical XML (with comments, with empty InclusiveNamespaces PrefixList ) [XML-XC14N]; ]] Martin Duerst suggests: [[ I think 'when encoded as [UTF-8]' would be slightly easier to understand than 'under [UTF-8] encoding'. ]] I take you to prefer not using the word 'correspond' at all, so combining I get: + when encoded as [UTF-8] are exclusive Canonical XML (with comments, with empty InclusiveNamespaces PrefixList ) [XML-XC14N]; and I think that in this way we can get rid of the 'correspond' word throughout. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2003 03:55:25 UTC