- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: 7 Aug 2003 15:26:23 -0500
- To: ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Cc: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "Graham Klyne" <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Message-Id: <69ED15D9-C915-11D7-A0FB-0003936780B2@aaronsw.com>
I've updated the draft to reflect all the comments I've received. Here are the changes I've made: 1. Changed type to be "rdf " so as to be consistent with the syntax doc. 2. Deleted section on social meaning. 3. Refers to Concepts instead of Model Theory. 4. Added paragraph to interoperability considerations: RDF is intended to allow common information to be exchanged between disparate applications. A basis for building common understanding is provided by <xref target="W3C.rdf-mt">a formal semantics</xref>, and applications that use RDF should do so in ways that are consistent with this. 5. Added paragraph to section on Fragment Identifiers: More details on RDF's view of fragment identifiers can be found in the section "Fragment Identifiers" of <xref target="W3C.rdf-concepts">the RDF Concepts document</xref>. The updated version is available at: http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype -03.html Unless there are any objections, I plan to submit it as an updated Internet-Draft. We'll probably do this again after the RDF specs go to REC. Thanks for all your help. -- Aaron Swartz: http://www.aaronsw.com/
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2003 16:26:26 UTC