- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 21 Jul 2003 14:12:04 +0100
- To: pfps@research.bell-labs.com, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1058793124.2149.37.camel@dhcp-91-136.hpl.hp.com>
Peter, with reference to your comment http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-02 The RDFCore WG resolved to accept your comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jul/0236.html As you know, there have been extensive modifications to the treatment of XML literals since your comment was written. The current editor's draft, which is now stable enough to review, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ now contains a version of the Lbase translation rules which we believe adequately covers the case you mention. XML Literals are now treated exactly uniformly with other typed literals in the Lbase axioms. Please note that the LBase reference is to the published note. Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, indicating whether this response adequately addresses your comment. Brian
Received on Monday, 21 July 2003 09:19:08 UTC