Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: 2003年1月14日 16:17:50 -0500 (EST)
• To: GK@ninebynine.org
• Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20030114.161750.68536914.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Subject: Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
Date: 2003年1月14日 19:57:41 +0000
[...]
> There is one statement in your review that I just don't understand:
> [[
> The list of uses in the motivations section has just about the best example
> of non-parallel construction that I have ever seen.
> ]]
> I think this may be a stylistic matter, but I can't be sure.
Yes, stylistic. In general, if you say 
 oijo oijoi ooij o oijoj ojio 
	- blah1
	- blah2
	- blah3
	- blah4
the blahi should belong to the same syntactic category. The list of
motivations uses several different syntactic categories, and thus should be
changed.
> #g
peter

Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 16:18:04 UTC