- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: 2003年6月16日 10:48:43 -0400 (EDT)
- To: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk
- Message-Id: <20030616.104843.71549825.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> Subject: Re: question about http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf Date: 2003年6月16日 15:43:11 +0100 > On 2003年5月22日 11:05:06 -0400 > "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > > > > > It appears to me that > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf > > should be allowable. In particular the claim is that rdf:bagID and > > rdf:resource are not both allowed on property elements. However, > > production 7.2.21 appears to allow both rdf:bagID and rdf:resource in > > empty property elements. > > rdf:bagID has, subsequent to the last public WD, been removed from the > RDF/XML language. Good. > Consquently both that production in the syntax WD > will be removed and that test case will be made into an error. > > Dave Will the be a list of post-last call changes? peter
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 10:48:57 UTC