- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: 2003年6月04日 18:59:56 -0400 (EDT)
- To: b.fallenstein@gmx.de
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20030604.185956.68545617.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
From: Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de> Subject: Re: strange treatment of namespaces in RDF/XML Date: 2003年6月04日 23:18:47 +0200 > > Hi Peter, > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > So > > ... xmlns:xm = "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namesp" > > ... rdf:about="ace#hi" ... > > is legal, as is > > ... xmlns:xmx = "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" > > ... rdf:about="#hi" ... > > but > > ... xmlns:xmxx = "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace#h" > > ... rdf:about="i" ... > > is not. > > But the rdf:about is resolved relatively to the base URI, right? So the > namespace declaration should not have any influence on the > interpretation of the rdf:about at all, or am I missing something? > > - Benja Argh, argh, argh. Mea culpa. When trying to put together an example, I went from QNames to rdf:about, to get around the problem with # in the local name, forgetting that rdf:about doesn't use QNames. Stupid me. The example should be So ... xmlns:xm = "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namesp" .. <xm:acehi ... /> ... is legal, as is ... xmlns:xmx = "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" .. <xmx:hi ... /> ... but ... xmlns:xmxx = "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespaceh" .. <xmxx:i ... /> ... is not. peter
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 19:00:19 UTC