- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 2003年5月27日 17:39:35 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030527173545.03fe4878@localhost>
At 07:24 25/05/2003 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] >I fail to see how this response addresses my comment. Well it was intended to address the summary given in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0160.html to which you did not appear to object. [...] >For the case of rdf:first above, I would much prefer > > rdf:first is an instance of rdf:Property that can be used to build > descriptions of lists and other list-like structures. A triple of > the form: > L rdf:first O > states that there is a first-element relationship between L and O. > > Note: RDFS does not require that there be only one first element > of a list-like structure, or even that a list-like structure have a > first element. > >I note that similar changes would have to be make for at least rdf:rest and >rdf:List. Thank you for the suggested alternative text. Danbri - what do you think? Brian
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:40:18 UTC