- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: 2003年4月25日 12:26:04 -0400 (EDT)
- To: danbri@w3.org
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20030425.122604.31746597.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Yes, this is fine, as a fix for this paragraph. It would be a good idea, however, to look for other places in the RDF documentation that have similar problems. peter From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> Subject: Re: What is RDF Schema? Date: 2003年4月25日 12:11:44 -0400 > Peter, > > > In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0149.html > you note, > > The RDF Schema document says > > > > RDF's vocabulary description language, RDF Schema, is an extension > > of RDF. It provides mechanisms for describing groups of related > > resources and the relationships between these resources. RDF Schema > > vocabulary descriptions are written in RDF. The extra descriptive > > power of RDF Schema is carried in a collection of RDF resources > > described in this document. > > > However, this is very unclear as to just what RDF Schema is. Is RDF Schema > > just a collection of RDF resources, like the representation of DC in RDFS? > > > This is, of course, incorrect, as RDF Schema is a semantic extension of > > RDF, as detailed in RDF Semantics. However, this is nowhere indicated in > > the RDF Schema document. > > Would the following revision to the paragraph quoted address your concern: > > "RDF's vocabulary description language, RDF Schema, is a > semantic extension([SX]) of RDF. It provides mechanisms for describing groups > of related resources and the relationships between these resources. > RDF Schema vocabulary descriptions are written in RDF using the terms > described in this document." > > ref [SX] RDF Semantics > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#intro > > > If not, could you suggest alternate text. > > thanks, > > Dan
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 12:26:19 UTC