- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: 2003年4月02日 18:04:56 +0100
- To: Roland Schwaenzl <roland@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>
- cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <11246.1049303096@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
>>>Roland Schwaenzl said: > maybe i'm missing something: Is there mentioning rdf:nodeID is not > supposed to survive parsing at another place than in the syntax and > model document? I'm sorry, I can't understand what you are asking here. rdf:nodeID is an attribute used in the RDF/XML syntax, it doesn't appear in the Semantics document or RDF model. > Isn't it rdf:nodeID's provide a simple hack, which allows to (re)-serialize > RDF graphs as rather flat verbose XML (with literal parsetype as > exception)? It isn't a hack, it allows you to give graph-local names so that you can write down triples with blank nodes in RDF/XML - it would be the same in any alternative serialization of such a graph. > > I would like to see cases -if there are- described in the primer, which > require (!) the use of rdf:ID, rdf:resource and other syntax constructs - Sorry again, I don't understand what you are asking about "requiring" the use of "syntax constructs". Dave
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 12:07:14 UTC