- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: 2002年11月25日 16:22:20 +0100
- To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "www-rdf-comments" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFCELIIJAA.danny666@virgilio.it>
> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/something#foo"> > >RDF defines the URI to refer to whatever a document of type >application/rdf-xml would define it to mean. RDF defines that, >irrespective of the mime-type of the document it is contained in. > >The point here is that there is no single mime-type for >http://example.org/something. In general, that URI does not denote a >representation with a specific mime-type. > >Now lets consider a URI that does refer specifically to that >representation: > > <rdf:Description >rdf:about="rep:text/html:http://example.org/something#foo"> > >then the RDF denotation of that uriref is exactly the same as the html one. Thanks, that's a lot clearer to me now. Which only leaves: what is the relationship *in the graph* (if any) between the resources referred to here? - <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/something"> and <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/something#foo">
Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 10:37:31 UTC