- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: 2002年3月14日 13:13:46 -0800
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: "www-rdf-comments" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <00d701c1cb9d214ドルd42a0657ドルba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com>
From: "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org> > That said, I rather like this idea. As it happens, I've made some > notes about extending the model theory to handle N3 style contexts > (which I think map quite nicely to this suggestion): > > http://www.ninebynine.org/RDFNotes/UsingContextsWithRDF.html Which is much appreciated :) But in which you say: [[ Using this approach, the number of triples will increase exponentially with the depth of context nesting. ]] Which I don't think is true. I think it is basically just 4 (maybe 5) times the number of triples. The number of triples for any level of nesting is just 4N + (if N>1, N) where N is the number of statements in whatever level of nesting past the top. Note this even provides that all the statements in one context are conjunctive. See mentograph: http://robustai.net/mentography/nesting_context.gif Seth Russell
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 16:17:38 UTC