- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: 2002年3月14日 21:03:33 +0200
- To: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>, ext Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <B8B6C0A5.10C07%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
On 2002年03月14日 19:55, "ext Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net> wrote: > From: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> > >>> I hope that RDF will move toward unicode strings as primitives, and >>> langauges as properties. { "chat"en = [lang:en "chat"].} >> >> This would, of course, require untidy literals, and we just decided >> to make literals tidy. >> >> If languages as properties, in conjuction with literals as subjects, >> is truly is a desirable feature in the future, should we rethink tidy >> literals? >> >> If literals remain tidy, then that closes the door on languages >> as properties. > > There must be some other assumption here; because we *can* have tidy > literals and { "chat"en = [lang:en "chat"].} and not use literals as > subjects just by letting the xml:lang attribute entail the extra Bnode. > > see mentograph: > http://robustai.net/mentography/rdf_lang2.gif Quite true. Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 14:01:39 UTC