- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 2002年3月11日 14:24:03 +0000
- To: timbl@w3.org
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020311142058.030d7358@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
Tim, In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Feb/0172.html you raised an issue which was captured in http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xmllang as [[[ "This is a mess - it is in the syntax and not in the model. Should have used an RDF vocabulary for language. It should be removed from the syntax." ]]] As recorded in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/#d-2002年02月26日-1 the RDFCore WG has resolved: [[ a literal consists of three components: o A representation of the parseType, which is a single bit o A language indicator which is a string as defined in XML o A fully normalized UNICODE string. ]] Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 09:25:53 UTC