Re: RDF Issue rdfms-literalsubjects

From: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>
[[
I understand that current RDF does not allow subjects to be literals. This
is acceptable as a response at this stage, because of the damage to the RDF
syntax to try to fix it.
]]
I don't understand this "damage" to syntax. What are the problems with just
using something like "rdf:aboutLiteral" instead of "rdf:about" where the
subject is a literal? I gather that there is no problems with the
semantics of using literals for subjects.
Seth Russell

Received on Sunday, 24 February 2002 14:32:31 UTC

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /