- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: 2002年1月28日 11:03:07 -0500
- To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <06b701c1a815476ドルfbf900ドルa2e249b@nemc.org>
The proposal is to make a small change to the current RDF syntax and allow an rdf:ID attribute on the rdf:RDF element. Perhaps this might be acceptably in scope for the current RDF WG. Regarding: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0350.html Nested contexts can be encoded: <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="..."> <rdf:RDF rdf:ID="#nest"> ... </rdf:RDF> <rdf:Description rdf:about="#nest"> ... </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> alternatively: <rdf:RDF> <rdf:Description rdf:about="#jonb"> <log:asserts> <rdf:RDF> .... nested context </rdf:RDF> </log:asserts> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> since it isn't entirely clear to me when RDF embedded within for example XHTML is intended to be asserted the issue of when the contents of a nested context (rdf:RDF element) are intended to be 'asserted' should be clarified. (I am providing this request for clarification as 'wiggle room' in the hope that it will bring the issue in-scope) Jonathan
Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 11:04:50 UTC