- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: 2001年4月25日 09:30:35 -0400
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Message-ID: <20010425093035.F7845@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:22:23AM -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote: > Re: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Apr/0047.html > > > [[ > > All elements and attributes in RDF must be namespace qualified > > ]] > > What is the reasoning for "all elements" being part of this requirement? > Many current RDF documents use default namespaces properly to default > elements. Is there a reason for disqualifying this practice? Perhaps something like: [[ Unqualified elements and attributes in RDF are discouraged ]] would be better. Art ---
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 09:31:56 UTC