- From: <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 11:49:27 -0500
- To: Eric Richardson <maxwell@telesoft.com>
- cc: DOM <www-dom@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <8525689C.005C68E4.00@D51MTA03.pok.ibm.com>
node.insertAfter(newKid,refChild), if it existed, would be precisely equivalent to node.insertBefore(newKid,refChild.getNextSibling()). Note that inserting before null means inserting at the end of the list, so the Right Thing should happen even in that case. Also note that a shorthand in that case is node.appendChild(newKid). So insertAfter might be convenient, but isn't strictly necessary. Which is why we left it out of Level 1. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2000 11:49:51 UTC