- From: <Ryonaitis@aol.com>
- Date: 2006年5月26日 15:00:16 EDT
- To: jbrewer@w3.org, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- CC: gv@trace.wisc.edu, wendy@w3.org, caldwell@trace.wisc.edu
- Message-ID: <45a.1bd4eae.31a8aa40@aol.com>
Hello All: I applaud the extension for comments especially with the summer holiday season beginning. I have read the comments and have one simple question; I apologize in advance if this has been previously asked. Your mail stated: "...but we encourage you to focus your attention on the relatively short guidelines document itself during the review period" I would appreciate your clarification. Should we be reviewing and commenting on the document as we have been doing but none of the WCAG 2.0 supporting documents? What are we reviewing for if not clarity of the document? Don't the supporting documents help us to understand the document? Are there any other documents that may help us all to understand each part/section of the document? Perhaps there are some internal documents that can be made public that can help as well? I truly appreciate any feedback you can share. I feel that I personally may have been looking at the entirety of the WCAG 2.0 documents and wasting much needed time! Any recommendations or perhaps a review checklist would be great to help my organization complete its review. Thank you in advance! Rob Yonaitis HiSoftware Company & W3C Member Founder & CTO
Received on Friday, 26 May 2006 19:00:35 UTC