- From: Andrew Somers <andy@generaltitles.com>
- Date: 2021年11月11日 23:34:31 -0800
- To: "Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael" <rmontgomery@loc.gov>
- Cc: Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <49255776-A839-4819-85EC-F490B5A45157@generaltitles.com>
Hi Rachel, all, IMO "Polishing" is a little odd. "Stable" is used a lot, but the description on the link seems different from the traditional use as it applies to IT. My suggestions are: Placeholder Exploratory Development Review Candidate Another alternate for 4 might be "Evaluation" and for 5, "Provisional". Thank you, Andy > On Nov 11, 2021, at 8:26 AM, Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael <rmontgomery@loc.gov> wrote: > > Hello, > > An outstanding decision from Tuesday’s meeting was to finalize the label names. This email is going to AG, Silver, and COGA to allow the broadest participation in the conversation. > > The current label names are: > Placeholder: > Exploratory > Maturing > Polishing > Stable > > Concerns were expressed about Polishing and Stable as they have alternate meanings so may be confusing. > > You can read more about the overall process and how these terms fit in athttps://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/AG_process <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/AG_process> > > Do you think the current terms work or, if not, what would you suggest as an alternative? > > Please reply to all lists for this conversation. > > Kind regards, > > Rachael > > --- > Rachael Bradley Montgomery, PhD > Digital Accessibility Specialist > Library of Congress > Email: rmontgomery@loc.gov <mailto:rmontgomery@loc.gov>
Received on Friday, 12 November 2021 07:35:00 UTC