- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: 2004年6月29日 10:49:00 -0500
- To: "Chris Ridpath" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>, "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org>, "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C46A1118E0262B47BD5C202DA2490D1A03317DE5@MAIL02.austin.utexas.edu>
Chris Ridpath wrote: <blockquote> We could clarify exactly what is required to avoid top-posting and then check all messages to this list to make sure they comply. Perhaps we could exclude messages that used top-posting from the archive until they were rewritten. Would that be a good thing? </blockquote> No. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org> To: "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 4:11 PM Subject: RE: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 > > > we need to encourage participation, not discourage it. Such rules > > would serve [to] intimidate people away from posting > > Yeah, insisting that people not post 2^n quantities of text for n > messages is really gonna be a barrier. > > If you can't figure out how not to top-post, delete all the preceding > text (two keystrokes on most systems: Select All, then delete, or just > Select All and start typing) and write from scratch. > > > > -- > > Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org > Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> > Expect criticism if you top-post >
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 11:49:01 UTC