- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: 2004年4月29日 10:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
- To: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Cc: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0404291009590.16875@homer.w3.org>
On 2004年4月29日, John M Slatin wrote: > >There's at least one problem with my proposed wording for the explnation of Level 1 success criteria: > >I wrote: >LEVEL 1 SUCCESS CRITERIA > > 1. Do not set limits on content or presentation; > >The problem is that it's incorrect: by requiring text equivalents for >non-text elements we *are* making demands on content and presentation (alt >text, captions, and longdescs all involve content, and they have to be >presented somehow). > >I think we can delete this item and leave the remaining ones in place. >Doing so might even have the benefit of making the difference between Levels >1 and 2 clearer. This makes sense to me, but given that I am still guessing at what the actual requirements will be I am not certain yet how to apply priorities... cheers Chaals
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 10:13:57 UTC